Projet

Général

Profil

Actions

MAY Best Practices » Historique » Révision 20

« Précédent | Révision 20/24 (diff) | Suivant »
Anonyme, 13/10/2014 18:03


MAY Best Practices

Typical Workflow

In the Java project, sources (Java and SpeADL) edited by the developer are in the src folder (or equivalent), and the generated Java code is in the speadl-gen folder.
The speadl-gen folder is not meant to be touched by hand.

Each modification of a SpeADL file is followed by the generation of its equivalent Java class.

A typical workflow for creating a component is as follow:

See SpeADL Minus Tutorial for a detailed tutorial.

Module View

On top of component declarations, interfaces and component implementation, it is relevant to define sometimes datatypes used in the interface or as type parameters of the components used.

A software component, its declaration, its implementation and classes it relies on form altogether what is called a module.

When creating interfaces or datatypes for one or several components, it is important to ask oneself to which module (i.e., with a given component) these declarations should belong to and why.

Project Organisation

For a simple project, a good organisation of the src directory is as follow:
  • Package my.project
    • SpeADL file myproject.speadl with a single namespace my.project.
    • Package interfaces containing the interfaces declarations
    • Package impl containing the implementations
    • Package datatypes containing extra classes needed
    • Package exception containing exceptions needed in the interfaces

In this case, all the modules are intermixed together.

For a more complex project, a good organisation of the src directory is as follow:
  • Package my.project
    • Package aComponent
      • SpeADL file aComponent.speadl
      • Package interfaces containing the interfaces declarations owned by this component
      • Package impl containing the implementation of the component
      • Package datatypes containing extra classes needed by this component
      • Package exception containing exceptions needed in the interfaces owned by this component
    • Package anotherComponent
      • ...

In this case each module has its own package.

Exploiting the Eclipse Editor

Errors

When creating a Java file to implement a component, one has to extend the Java class generated from the component declaration.

Errors are shown in the Java editor, and the Quick Fix Add unimplemented methods proposed by Eclipse will generate automatically the skeleton for the Java file.

From that:

public class MySimpleComponentImpl extends MySimpleComponent {
}

We get that:

public class MySimpleComponentImpl extends MySimpleComponent {
    @Override
    protected AnotherJavaInterface make_p1() {
        // TODO Auto-generated method stub
        return null;
    }
}

This gives the possibility to very quickly approach the implementation of a component.

Completion

When implementing the make_XXX() method of a provided port, one can exploit completion to gain a lot of time.
For example in the following situation (just after using the Quick Fix):

class MySimpleComponentImpl extends MySimpleComponent {
    @Override
    protected AnotherJavaInterface make_p1() {
        // TODO Auto-generated method stub
        return null;
    }
}

Remove the null after the return statement and replace it with new AnotherJavaInterface, use completion (Ctrl+Space) and select AnotherJavaInterface() Anonymous Inner Type to generate the anonymous type declaration as well as the skeleton to implement its methods:

public class MySimpleComponentImpl extends MySimpleComponent {
    @Override
    protected AnotherJavaInterface make_p1() {
        return new AnotherJavaInterface() {
            @Override
            public Integer test() {
                // TODO Auto-generated method stub
                return null;
            }
        };
    }
}

Implementing Provided Ports

When implementing provided ports, there is two main ways of doing it:
  • Using an anonymous instance of the interface.
  • By implementing the interface directly with the component implementation.

Using an anonymous class is as follow:

public class MySimpleComponentImpl extends MySimpleComponent {

    @Override
    protected AnotherJavaInterface make_p1() {
        return new AnotherJavaInterface() {
            @Override
            public Integer test() {
                return 10;
            }
        };
    }

}

Implementing the interface is as follow:

public class MySimpleComponentImpl extends MySimpleComponent implements AnotherJavaInterface {

    @Override
    public Integer test() {
        return 10;
    }

    @Override
    protected AnotherJavaInterface make_p1() {
        return this;
    }
}

Required Ports and Their Importances

Components expose their required functionalities through explicit ports bound when composition is done.
This is very different from objects that must be given directly an object providing a required functionality.

Implicit Dependencies

An error that must be avoided when defining a component is to express a dependency to a functionality by requiring objects to be passed to their implementation constructor or by instantiating other objects in their implementation.
It is better to explicit such dependencies through required ports.

Of course this rule can be bent when the functionality is really internal to the component implementation and when it has nothing to do with the architecture the component is part of.
But it is a good practice to explicit required functionalities like this for facilitating future evolution.

No Shared Objects between Components

A very dangerous case of the previous discussed case is when two components actually share a reference to a same object.
This really means that there is a functionality that must be explicited through the creation of a third component that exposes the functionality through one of its port.

Mis à jour par Anonyme il y a plus de 11 ans · 24 révisions